Lay Anglicana, the unofficial voice of the laity throughout the Anglican Communion.
This is the place to share news and views from the pews.

Get involved ...

Journey of Faith: Laura Sykes (part two)

 Are you sitting comfortably? Then I’ll begin. This post will probably make more sense if you read the first part first, but do just plunge in if you prefer.  You will appreciate that I am describing events of forty years ago, which I have not previously looked back on this analytically, trying to work out my motives and my mood. I hope to tell the truth and nothing but the truth. But I am looking backwards through a glass darkly and, dear reader, it will not be the whole truth for the fashion for epics has passed.

After my Indian idyll, I spent nearly a year in Trinidad with the family of my greatest friend at university. It was intended to be a fortnight’s holiday to take part in Edmund Hart’s Inferno band at 1970 Carnival (as a vampire – see right), but I had no compelling reason to return to England and I was lucky enough to be invited to stay on as part of the family. I taught English and History at Bishop Anstey High School and a state of emergency was declared. To this day I deny that there was any connection between these two events, although the set books were Animal Farm and Julius Caesar. The headmistress told me I was on no account to mention the word ‘revolution’. Not for the first (or last) time, I had some difficulty in following the diktats of those in authority over me.

My friend was posted to Geneva, and it was clearly time for me to move on. We had all spent Christmas 1968 in New York,  since when I had longed to live there. So, with about $100 in my pocket and an introduction from my grandmother to Edith Lutyens (but no job or anywhere to live) I arrived in Manhattan. I got a job at British Information Services, and a fifth-floor walk-up apartment on Lexington, between 57th and 58th street, thanks to Edith. Think ‘Barefoot in the Park’. My church-going for the next three years was pretty much limited to occasional visits with Marjorie Kenyon to her local church in Old Lyme or St Barts on Park Avenue.

It was not that I ceased to think about God. On the contrary, as you will see, I was spiritually omnivorous. At no stage did I reject Christ, but nor did I focus on Him. With hindsight (a wonderful thing) I see this as a belated rebellion, part of growing up. I had always resisted doing what was expected of me when it was expected of me: an aunt with whom I had been despatched to spend Christmas at the age of ten later remarked drily to my mother that I was ‘an argumentative little blighter’ and at school I had declined to be confirmed at the same time as the other girls in my class, feeling that it was not to be ‘taken in hand unadvisedly or lightly’, like the bronze life-saving medal, another school enterprise undertaken en masse. I was confirmed the following year. (What a little prig I must have been!)

Edith Lutyens (r)

One aspect of Christianity that has always bothered me is  that if I had been born in the Middle East, I would probably be Moslem, if I had been born in India, I would be Hindu, if I had been born in Japan I would be Shintoist and so on. Connected with this is the uncomfortable fact that if I had been born before the birth of Christ, I would not be Christian. I cannot believe that these people are ineligible for heaven. I imagine you know the story of the six blind men and the elephant, one version of which comes from the Mahabharata. This makes sense to me, and I am not alone: even Bishop Desmond Tutu called his book  ‘God is not a Christian’.

It was as if I continued to feel part of the Body of Christ, but was trying on different outfits from the dressing-up box in the attic to wear on top of my Christian faith.

But to return to Edith, my mentor for the next three years. She showed me the world of her New York in the 1970s, the world of theatre and design, including one memorable evening with Tilli Losch. I thought it was glamorous and exciting and wonderful. One of her friends was Michael Dyne, author of The Right Honourable Gentleman.

Michael was a follower of Gurdjieff and Ouspensky, and gave me a copy of  The Fourth Way.  If you are interested, you can read part of the introduction here.  Roughly speaking, few people could understand Gurdjieff, so Ouspensky tried to explain his thinking. It is a relief to admit, after all these years, that I had great difficulty in understanding Ouspensky either.  I wanted to be capable of great thought, and I wanted to please Michael, but we both realised that I was not quite  the disciple that he was looking for. Instead, he told me about the I Ching, the one with Jung’s introduction.

This is a Confucian oracle, with 64 possible answers to whatever question one might pose. I asked whether I should return permanently to England: the answer was to the effect that I had many miles still to travel “before crossing the Great Water”. I thought this a very clever answer.

Next I moved to the Tarot.
I joined a group, where we met weekly in each other’s houses to learn about the symbolism of the 22 major arcana. We did not use the cards to predict the future – the idea was based on psychoanalysis, that we should meditate on the images in order to establish the sort of contact with our unconscious minds normally only available in sleep. I have not looked at the Tarot since leaving New York (having in one sense outgrown the need) but there are one or two images which are interesting in a Christian context. The obvious one is The Fool. Also water plays a significant part, as the water of life does in Christianity.

 

During my stay in New York, one odd thing did happen. The Ark Royal came to town and, as traditionally happens, the British Consulate was asked to provide a list of suitable people to invite on board, to be heavily weighted in favour of nubile females. British Information Services, of which I was part, were invited en bloc. There were perhaps two or three hundred officers as our hosts. I spent a long time in conversation with a most interesting man, who turned out to be the Roman Catholic padre. We reached the end of our conversation, and continued to circulate. The next man I talked to, equally interesting, turned out to be the Church of England chaplain. It was then time to go home. I am still wondering what this says about them – and about me. We hear about gaydar, do you think there is such a thing as ‘spaydar’, for people with an interest in spirituality to seek each other out? (Since this is the most flattering explanation, it is as you will understand the one I prefer to accept).

I returned to England, and married Robert, then head of the Drama and Dance Department of the British Council. We were married by the Revd Bruce Gillingham, then chaplain of Robert’s Oxford college. I became a more regular  churchgoer, to St Paul’s Wilton Place in the time of the Revd Christopher Courtauld. A magical six years followed, in which we went to the theatre (at no expense) at least twice a week. And then it was time to go abroad again – I pleaded to go back to India, and we arrived in Calcutta in August 1987.

Was I still smitten by India and all things Indian?  ‘What time are the animal sacrifices at the Kali Temple?’ asked an official visitor who had come to stay. I offered her my car and driver, but declined to accompany her, though I did manage not to voice my distaste at the question. However, she must have sensed it, for on my return I found she had put a painted clay statue of Kali, about two feet high, in the middle of my dining table, complete with necklace of skulls. What would you have done in my place?

I moved the statue to the hall table for the night. The next day, after our guests left, we were fortuitously going on a boat trip on the Hooghly. It is the custom, at the end of the Durga Puja and some other festivals, to immerse the clay images in the Hooghly. This is therefore not considered disrespectful, but a fitting end. I put Kali in a carrier bag, with respect, and took her on board the boat. Without telling the others what I was doing, since I did not want a fuss made, I slipped her into the river on the down tide – she would have disssolved before reaching the Bayof Bengal.

I would like to leave the last word to Emily Dickinson

We play at paste
Till qualified for pearl,
then drop the paste,
And deem ourself a fool
The shapes, though, were similar,
And our new hands
Learned gem tactics
Practising sands.

 

◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊

The main illustration is by Andy Lindley Light Through Stained Glass via  Twelve Baskets

26 comments on this post:

UKViewer said...
avatar

So, episode two is still travelling, learning and finally settling down, to more travelling.

Still a little rootless perhaps. I sometimes wonder about roots. What roots us? I think that perhaps you are rooted in new experiences, looking wider than the horizens, wondering where the next one is?

I, on the other hand, seek to discern my current horizens intimately before thinking about how much more might be lying on the other side of it. Perhaps I’m a slow starter and being rooted in something has been an alien concept to me until a few years ago.

I suppose that an Army career for 43 years might be described as rooted – but for me it was always transient. Being in different placed, doing different, but much the same things, while climbing the slippery ladder of promotion and progression. Only when I reached the end of my first career in 1989 and a new marriage did I start to feel rooted.

I embarked on a second Army career, but from a secure base. One home, one spouse and family and travelled to wherever the job took me. It meant long distance commuting at the latter end of it, but it was the sacrifice I was willing to make to preserve that rootedness I felt. Particularly as by this time, children had sprouted another generation of grand children.

When I read your stories of mentors, I recall some who I met in my travels. There was Mick, who remains a friend, who had a heart for people that was the biggest I’ve ever met, and that includes anyone I’ve met inside or outside the church. He showed his love and respect for his fellow human beings in many ways that gave me a growth and depth that I didn’t appreciate until I took stock on his retirement and was asked to make a speech about his years in the service.

There are of course others, not famous, just normal people living extraordinary lives, filled with love for their fellow man (or woman) that gives them the grace to be just good with all.

All of this leads, I can see to Christ, being there, alongside us, while we grow, spread our wings, and blossom into the people we can and should be. Fully human, I wonder why we can’t seem to achieve similar things for all – are we so limited or blinkered that it’s beyond us to treat people as we would like to be treated?

But I digress, I’m wondering what it is about the Orient, its people and culture that so fascinates you? Is it the exotic or mysterious or just the difference from what we are familiar with? Please own up!! 🙂

Lay Anglicana said...
avatar

Thank-you Ernie. Rootless, yes. Also in some senses without the constant influence and company of parents from an early age. Being shunted around more or less willing relations in between boarding school was not, I grant you, quite as grim an experience as in ‘Jane Eyre’ but nevertheless had some of the same characteristics. It made me independent at an early age, but – looking back – I see it also made me hunger for parental interest. I was lucky enough to find several people in my life who have helped me by filling that role, and I hope that I may also have filled some need in them. Michael, for example, never married or had children and I was to some extent a daughter for him.

You ask if I am drawn to India because it is ‘exotic, mysterious or just different from what we are familiar with’. The short answer is no – India is not unfamiliar or mysterious. I have spent about one third of my life living in the subcontinent, from the time I went to kindergarten in Lahore in 1952 until I left for the last time in about 2000. I have Delhi friends, now in Bangalore, who come and stay every summer. The culture is part of who I am. But I no longer wish to *be* Indian, that is the difference.

Joyce said...
avatar

Rudyard ( pronounce it Ruj – erd, not Rud – yard, everybody, please. The place after which he is named was a favourite family beauty spot and we knew what it was called )Kipling, who was sent to school in the UK when he was barely able to speak English, wrote about having ‘two sides to his head’. Once he had accepted his British side,on balance he felt it was an advantage.
I found his attitude comforting. Anybody who thinks being brought up on another continent is disturbing should try not being sure if you’re English or Welsh. 🙂

23 October 2012 15:36
22 October 2012 19:57
22 October 2012 18:25
Alan said...
avatar

Your post reminded me of the summer I spent at the French Market in New Orlenas, working as a tarot card reader. I recall repeatedly explaining that I was not ‘predicting the future’ but that the cards were a system of symbols through which I would interpret the seeker’s ‘subconscious vibrations’. Part of me thinks that I actually wasn’t half bad with the tarot cards. Yet another part of me is just appalled that I could ever have been such an ass.

Lay Anglicana said...
avatar

I tried doing a tarot reading once for someone else – big mistake! Despite making the same point as you did, that it was not about predicting the future etc etc, she cut the session short, objecting that I was using it to give her the same advice I would have given her over a pot of coffee without the cards!

22 October 2012 20:00
22 October 2012 18:35
Hannah said...
avatar

I think ‘spaydar’ is possible. I think that mixed with serendipity/God having a plan for me is what means that me and Ruby (@rubyam) even though she’s in Australia and I’m here in the UK still managed to meet via Twitter and realise that we’d either be the best of friends because we both like so much of the same things or we’d get on each others nerves because we are so similar, but a massive thing that features in those similarities is being a Christian.

Since Saturday I’ve been thinking about writing “my story” down and sharing it but I then doubt myself and think it would be really boring!

Lay Anglicana said...
avatar

Oh Hannah, please please write it! It won’t be boring at all (even if you have less material as you have not scored up my number of years on the planet – and that is a problem that will solve itself. Meanwhile you need to get into training!)

22 October 2012 20:46
22 October 2012 20:41
Grandmère Mimi said...
avatar

Laura, you’re recounting far more than your faith life in these reminiscences. What an interesting life you’ve had.

UKViewer asks, “What roots us?” No money at first and then marrying a man who was rooted in Louisiana.

Lay Anglicana said...
avatar

Thank you for commenting, Grandmère Mimi. Yes, you’re quite right, it is hard to write about one’s faith without giving some sketch of one’s character at the time, I think. A difficult balance? Now, I think you have only lifted one of your seven veils, the Louisiana stage of your life. What was Mimi before she was even a mère – now that would be a story!

Grandmère Mimi said...
avatar

In short, Laura, I’ve been an uppity female from early on. I’ve told part of my story in spurts on my blog but not in any organized way.

24 October 2012 00:29
23 October 2012 10:23
22 October 2012 21:24
Chris Fewings said...
avatar

I’m looking forward to further episodes!

Lay Anglicana said...
avatar

Thanks Chris, I think! But that is enough revelation for now – surely I have already offered up seven veils?

Joyce said...
avatar

Oh gosh ! You mean there’s no part three ? I was already looking forward to it.

UKViewer said...
avatar

I thought that it was about two and a half veils. Much more to be revealed 🙂

Lay Anglicana said...
avatar

Calm down dear!

25 October 2012 19:12
25 October 2012 18:03
23 October 2012 15:20
23 October 2012 07:01
23 October 2012 00:47
Joyce said...
avatar

Laura, what being a Christian comes down to in the end is not where or by whom we were brought up,not to understimate how important that is,but a relationship with Jesus.
Christianity is only where it is because at some time the people have received mission and listened. As the first churches spread, the converts mentioned in Acts and written to in the Epistles had all been brought up as something else. How much further from there was the British Isles in the known world ? And yet the Gospel reached them. Every community of Christians must have begun with those who rebelled against the local religion.I suppose we’ve all asked ourselves at some time or other what we would have been had we been born into another culture. You are not alone in that.You have had the experience of seeing other faiths in their native lands,Laura, so you know what you’re talking about.
Speaking for myself I was always one to whom others said, ‘You just have to be different, don’t you ?’
I daresay I’d have been drawn to Jesus as soon as I’d heard about Him,wherever I was, possibly because of rather than in spite of all around me being for Mohammed or Shiva or Buddha. One has to admit that having a founder who’s alive is attractive in a religion,not to mention demanding. What I don’t know is that I’d have the courage to keep it up. I’m acquainted with Sikhs and Hindus who are Christians in their hearts by belief but who are afraid to practise beyond attending school functions (Many, perhaps most Asians live in the catchment of a C of E school) because they and their families are closely tied to one of the local religious centres which form the focus of their community. They have this overwhelming fear of offending their relatives, especially in-laws. Those who stuck their necks out formed their own Asian Christian Community with a vicar.That shows how much they need support.

23 October 2012 20:31
Joyce said...
avatar

The Fourth Way is £2.00 on Kindle,and there’s one by Gurdjieff for 77p. I bought them both and I’ll let you know what I think,Laura. I read the brief summary of what The Fourth Way is about on the Wikipedia link you gave and I rather fancied it.
I love the way you were travelling and learning about the world when I was doing things much more prosaic but worthwhile to me.In those pre-Laker days when a plane ticket cost more than a medium-sized house in the Midlands,hardly anyone I knew had been abroad apart from war service and long-saved-up-for school trips. Ernie was in London delivering the post if I’ve got the chronology right. Even so, the Lord seems to have made Divine Appointments for all of us.

Lay Anglicana said...
avatar

Perhaps you could do a review for Lay Anglicana?

Joyce said...
avatar

Yes, Laura. When I’ve finished reading if there’s anything not covered in reviews already I’ll have a go.

UKViewer said...
avatar

Joyce, I was delivering the post from 65 to 67 but telegrams as I was a Young Postman as the telegram boys were described 🙂

Than in the Army from April 67 to October 200
9. I was starting my travels, but mainly in Europe, the furthest I got was Cyprus.

It was only in 1990 that I got to Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand and back via the USA. We did a round the world trip as a delayed honeymoon. Later we travelled to Hong Kong and went elsewhere as part of a months trip.

I’m not sure that I’m a traveller and settler, more of a tourist, wanting to see and learn about the places we visit, but not really bent on finding a new paradise. I actually believe that I’ve found it in my benefice to a great extent.

25 October 2012 18:02
24 October 2012 22:15
24 October 2012 10:38
24 October 2012 02:32
Matthew Caminer said...
avatar

I too greatly enjoyed reading your story, Laura. Thank you so much for sharing it with us. One thing that I am intrigued about, on similar lines to our discussions on the various bishops, is where you are churchmanship (churchpersonship?!) -wise, and how you came to settle there. I don’t mean your position on the big issues that we are tussling with but, to use the current euphemism, how far you are up or down the candle and what made you settle there. Perhaps not to coax out a whole Part Three, but maybe another comment?

Lay Anglicana said...
avatar

I think (unfortunately!) you have a good point. I felt it quite difficult to remove the six veils that I have removed so far, but you are right that I had kept one, seventh, veil to cover my modesty. One can always distance oneself from youthful folly, but to describe how I feel about God and the Church at this point will require a further degree of self-examination which I need a week or two to prepare. Nevertheless, I think the readers of this blog are entitled to ask for this, and I will do my best to oblige 🙂

24 October 2012 17:41
24 October 2012 16:40
debashish bhattacharya said...
avatar

Hello Laura, greetings from Debashish Bhattacharya. I worked as Information Officer (LE) at BDHC Calcutta at the time you and Robert Sykes came and worked there for sometime. Robert wrote me a very kind personal letter when I lost my mother in 1988. I enjoyed your hospitality for several times though I do not expect you to remember me across the ages. It was nice to stumble on your blog suddenly, my regards for you and Robert. / Debashish

Lay Anglicana said...
avatar

How nice to hear from you, Debashish – I certainly do remember you and think back fondly on our time in Calcutta :>)

debashish bhattacharya said...
avatar

Thanks Laura, hope you and Robert are fine, will be in touch.

14 January 2014 11:24
14 January 2014 11:15
14 January 2014 08:22
avatar

[…] first post that comes up is titled “Journey of Faith” (Part One and Part Two are now available). I read Part One while we sat chatting and discussing blogs and also things that […]

21 January 2014 00:15

Leave a Reply

We rely on donations to keep this website running.